I am not an "early adopter" of technology - nor probably anything else. In fact, the picture below is of my actual cell phone - which most people laugh at when they see it. But, it cost me $20 for the phone and 9.99 a month so I'm reasonably happy. Plus, my brother has the same model!!! (Hmmm.)
But this isn't about phones, it's about "reading devices," which I've been reluctant to embrace.
In a crisis, the local Hillsborough County Library did not have "Snow
Crash" by Neal Stephenson in real print, which was on my list. It was available in
eBook however. I borrowed ML's Kindle Fire that she got for a gift a
year or so ago and rarely uses. It was easy to download it to the Fire,
although I had to get ML to do it through her Amazon account. I didn't
even have to go to the library . . .
So here's what I think . . ..
a.) If I traveled a lot, I would definitely have a electronic reader.
b.) I would have preferred more words on the "Fire" page. Too much swiping!
c.) It was nice that if a question came up, related to the book or not, I could switch over to the Fire browser and look it up with the same device.
d.) The real benefit from my thinking is that if I subscribed to the "tablet" versions of magazines and/or newspapers that I get, I could get rid of tons of clutter surrounding the various chairs and bedside table that I use: stacks of books, magazines, newspapers, little slips of paper with notes on them, references that I'm saving to look up when I have time, you name it. (like you see in the photo on the left.)
Just think, maybe we could have a clean house with one tablet each.
No, you're right, even that won't work.
I confess, it was OK, but I still like fumbling with a real book. Must be my age.